Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish that constitutional rights belong to natural persons only, prohibit corporate spending to influence elections, limit campaign contributions and expenditures, and provide for public financing of federal elections.
In republics, persons elevated from the mass of the community, by the suffrages of their fellow-citizens, to stations of great pre-eminence and power, may find compensations for betraying their trust, which, to any but minds animated and guided by superior virtue, may appear to exceed the proportion of interest they have in the common stock, and to overbalance the obligations of duty.
There are three kinds of aristocracy spoken of in this country... the second is an aristocratic faction, a junto of unprincipled men, often distinguished for their wealth or abilities, who combine together and make their object their private interests and aggrandizement; the existence of this description is merely accidental, but particularly to be guarded against.
Why This Amendment?
Corporate Personhood
Courts have ruled that corporations are "persons" with free speech rights. But corporations are not people. They cannot vote. They do not have the same stake in the country that citizens do. Treating them as people gives them power they were never meant to have.
Money as Speech
Courts have ruled that spending money is the same as speaking. This means the more money you have, the more "speech" you get. Wealthy donors and corporations can flood elections with ads, some of them misleading or false, while regular citizens cannot compete.
Unequal Influence
When politicians depend on big donors to win elections, they listen to those donors. Laws get written to help the wealthy and corporations instead of the people. The public interest loses to private interest.
No Limits
The United States allows unlimited independent spending through Super PACs. No other top-performing democracy does this. Most ban corporate political donations entirely or set strict limits. America is the outlier.
Candidates For the People
Elections belong to citizens again. Corporations cannot drown out voters with money. Candidates answer to people, not companies.
Real Voices
Everyone's voice carries equal weight. A billionaire's opinion does not count more than a teacher's. Candidates compete on ideas, not fundraising.
Public Campaign Financing
Candidates can run using public funds so they do not depend on wealthy donors. Fourteen states and 26 cities already do this. Candidates who use public financing spend less time fundraising and more time listening to voters.
Candidates Over Advertising
Campaigns compete on a level playing field. Candidates without wealthy backers can still win. Voters hear from more people, not just whoever has the most money behind them.
This proposal sets rules for federal elections only. States still control campaign finance for state and local races.
The proposal says that in federal elections, corporations and organizations cannot spend money to influence outcomes. Only citizens can donate, and donations have limits. Public financing gives candidates a way to run without depending on wealthy donors.
Within ten years, states must adopt the same standards. This is not about controlling state elections—it is about making sure money does not overpower citizens anywhere in the country. If one state allows unlimited corporate spending while another does not, candidates and donors will exploit the difference. A national floor ensures that wealth cannot buy elections at any level.
Every other major democracy limits campaign spending and bans or restricts corporate donations. The United States is the only one that treats corporate money as protected speech. This proposal brings America in line with democratic practice worldwide.
Campaign Finance
Each section shows the legal text and what it means in plain language. You don't need a law degree to understand what you're voting on.
Campaign Finance
Legal text
- The rights protected by this Constitution are the rights of natural persons only. Corporations and other entities created by law shall not be considered persons for purposes of political speech or campaign activity.
- The spending of money to influence elections shall not be considered speech protected by the First Amendment. Congress and the States shall have power to regulate and limit contributions and expenditures for the purpose of influencing elections.
- No corporation, labor union, nonprofit, or other entity created by law shall contribute or spend any amount to influence any election for federal office.
- No natural person may contribute more than five hundred dollars to any candidate or one thousand dollars total to all candidates and political parties in any calendar year. Contributions may only be made directly to candidates or political parties. Congress may adjust these amounts only to reflect changes in the value of money.
- Congress shall establish by law limits on total expenditures by candidates for each federal office. No candidate may exceed such limit from any source, including personal funds.
- Congress shall establish by law a system of public financing available to all candidates who qualify for the ballot. Public financing shall be distributed on equal terms to all qualifying candidates. No allocation formula shall favor candidates based on prior fundraising, incumbency, or party affiliation.
- If Congress fails to establish expenditure limits and public financing prior to the next federal election following ratification:
(1) No Senator or Representative shall receive any compensation from the United States until such legislation is enacted;
(2) The Federal Election Commission shall establish expenditure limits and public financing by regulation within ninety days, which shall remain in effect until Congress acts. - All contributions and expenditures for the purpose of influencing elections shall be publicly disclosed within forty-eight hours. Any entity that contributes to candidates or political parties shall disclose the identity of all natural persons with an ownership interest of five percent or more.
- Foreign nationals and foreign governments shall not contribute or spend any amount to influence any election in the United States.
Plain Language
- The Constitution protects the rights of real human beings only. Companies, corporations, unions, and other legal entities are not treated as people when it comes to political speech or campaign activity.
- Spending money to influence an election is not considered protected free speech. Congress and the states may set limits on how much money can be given or spent in elections.
- Corporations, labor unions, and other legal entities may not give or spend any money to influence federal elections.
- An individual may not give more than $500 to any one candidate, or more than $1000 total to all candidates and political parties in a single year and must give it directly to the candidate or party. Congress may only adjust these amounts to keep up with inflation.
- Congress must set a total spending limit for each federal office. No candidate may spend more than that limit, even if using personal funds.
- Congress must create a public funding system that is available to all candidates who qualify for the ballot equally to all candidates who qualify. The rules for giving out this money cannot favor someone because they raised more money before, already hold office, or belong to a certain political party.
- If Congress does not create spending limits and public financing before the next federal election:
(1) Senators and Representatives will not be paid until they pass the required laws;
(2) The Federal Election Commission must create temporary spending limits and public financing rules within ninety days, and those rules will stay in place until Congress acts. - All money given or spent to influence elections must be made public within forty-eight hours. Any organization that gives money must also reveal the names of individuals who own five percent or more of it.
- Foreign citizens and foreign governments may not give or spend any money to influence elections in the United States.
Enforcement
Legal text
- The rights secured by this article are self-executing and shall not require enabling legislation to be enforceable.
- Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
- Any citizen of the United States shall have standing to bring suit in any federal court to enforce the provisions of this article.
- No State law or action inconsistent with this article shall have any force or effect.
- No provision of this article shall be construed to limit individual rights or remedies otherwise available under this Constitution or the laws of the United States.
- The Federal Election Commission established by the Fair Elections Amendment shall have authority to investigate violations of this article and impose civil penalties.
Plain Language
- The amendment works on its own. The moment it becomes part of the Constitution, people can use it. Congress does not have to pass another law first to “turn it on.” If someone violates it, a court can enforce it right away.
- Congress has the power to pass laws to carry out and enforce this amendment.
- Any U.S. citizen can go to federal court if they believe this amendment is being broken. They do not have to be a politician or a government official. Regular people are allowed to ask a judge to enforce it.
- Any State law or action that conflicts with this amendment has no legal effect.
- It does not take away any other rights people already have. It adds protections, but it does not reduce anything that already exists in the Constitution or other laws. If someone has another legal option to protect their rights, they can still use it.
- The Federal Election Commission created under Fair Elections Amendment has the power to investigate violations of this amendment and to issue civil penalties when the law is broken.
Effective Date and Implementation
Legal text
- This article shall take effect immediately upon ratification.
- Congress shall provide for the funding necessary to implement public financing through existing appropriations, budget reallocations, or reductions in other expenditures, and may not fund its implementation through fees, surcharges, or new taxes imposed on the general public. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit Congress from adjusting tax policy applicable to higher‑income individuals or large corporations to meet these obligations.
- This article applies to federal elections upon ratification. Within ten years of ratification, each State shall adopt consistent standards for state and local elections.
- This article shall be inoperative unless ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within one year from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
Plain Language
- This starts immediately once voted in; no waiting period.
- Congress has to fund public financing by using money it already has, by moving money around in the budget, or by cutting other spending. It cannot pay for this by charging new fees or creating new taxes on regular people. But Congress is still allowed to change tax rules for people with higher incomes or big corporations if it needs to cover the cost.
- Once the amendment becomes law, states have up to ten years to apply the rules to state candidates running for state office positions.
- It only becomes part of the Constitution if enough states approve it. Three-fourths of the states must vote yes. If that does not happen within one year after Congress sends it to the states, then the amendment fails and does not take effect at all.
Provisional Voting
These options exist because some provisions in this amendment have more than one legitimate solution. The draft reflects what comparative research and international precedent suggest is the strongest approach — but reasonable people can disagree on implementation.
You get one vote per poll. You are not required to vote on any of them. Only vote if you believe the current draft language should change. If none of the listed options reflect your position, you can submit an alternative in the discussion below.
Questions and Consideration
This discussion space is limited to questions, suggestions, and substantive discussion directly related to the amendment proposal and its specific provisions. It is not a forum for general political advocacy, campaign messaging, misinformation, or self-promotion. All comments are moderated for relevance, accuracy, and compliance with the site’s participation standards. Comments that do not meet these requirements will be rejected. If a comment is rejected, the user will be notified and provided the reason for rejection.