Skip to main content
Amendment Category
Display Title
No. 6: Judicial Qualifications & Selection
Summary

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish a Judicial Selection Commission, define the composition and procedures for selecting federal judges, establish qualifications and disqualifications for judicial nominees, and provide for geographic restrictions on judicial assignment.

Federalist Quote

The members of the legislature will rarely be chosen with a view to those qualifications which fit men for the stations of judges; and as, on this account, there will be great reason to apprehend all the ill consequences of defective information, so, on account of the natural propensity of such bodies to party divisions, there will be no less reason to fear that the pestilential breath of faction may poison the fountains of justice.

- Federalist No. 81 (Hamilton)

Anti-Federalist Quote

In forming this branch, our objects are — a fair and open, a wise and impartial interpretation of the laws — a prompt and impartial administration of justice, between the public and individuals, and between man and man.

- Anti-Federalist (Federal Farmer XV)

Why This Amendment?

Hamilton warned that legislators would rarely be chosen for qualities that make good judges. The Anti-Federalists wanted "a fair and open, a wise and impartial" judiciary. Neither side would recognize what we have today. The United States ranks 26th in the world on the Rule of Law Index—in the bottom half of wealthy democracies. On access to civil justice, America ranks 112th out of 143 countries. Trust in courts is at historic lows and deeply divided by party. The countries with the most trusted court systems—Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden—all use independent commissions to select judges based on qualifications, not politics. In those countries, judicial selection is transparent, merit-based, and free from partisan interference. Federal judges in the United States are selected through a broken process that prioritizes politics over qualifications. 
  • Political Selection

    Presidents nominate judges based on ideology, not competence. Senators confirm or block based on party loyalty. The public has no insight into why a nominee was chosen or what qualifies them for a lifetime appointment.

  • No Transparent Qualifications

    There are no required standards for becoming a federal judge. No minimum experience. No demonstrated expertise. No public explanation of why one lawyer was chosen over thousands of others.

  • Judicial Vacancies 

    Courts claim they cannot handle their caseloads, yet judicial seats remain empty for years. Vacancies are left unfilled for political reasons—to deny one president appointments or save them for another. Justice delayed is justice denied, and the delay is deliberate.

  • No Conflict of Interest Restrictions

    Judges can be assigned to courts in regions where they have personal ties—where they practiced law, owned property, or have business relationships. This creates conflicts of interest. A judge ruling on cases involving former clients, colleagues, or local power structures cannot be impartial.

  • Credibility at Higher Courts

    When cases move to appeals courts or the Supreme Court, the lower court judge's reasoning matters. But if no one knows why that judge was qualified in the first place, the credibility of the entire system suffers.

Amendment Title

Judicial Qualifications & Selection

Each section shows the legal text and what it means in plain language. You don't need a law degree to understand what you're voting on.

Status Voting open
1 Verified votes cast
Judicial Selection Commission

Plain Language

  1. There will be a Judicial Selection Commission made up of nine people:
    (1) Three retired federal judges;
    (2) Two attorneys;
    (3) Four regular citizens who have never been lawyers or judges.
  2. The Chair of the Commission must be one of the regular citizen members, and the Commission will choose that person from among those four.
  3. The Commission will choose and nominate people to serve on the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, and the federal courts of appeals.
Selection of Commissioners

Plain Language

  1. The three retired judge members will be chosen this way: retired federal judges may apply to serve, and the chief judges of the thirteen federal courts of appeals will work together to select three of them.

  2. The two attorney members will be chosen by the American Bar Association.

  3. The four regular citizen members will be chosen by the chief justices of the state supreme courts, divided into four regions of the country:
    (1) The Northeast region includes Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
    (2) The South region includes Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Arkansas.
    (3) The Midwest region includes Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas.
    (4) The West region includes Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Alaska, and Hawaii.

  4. The chief justices in each region will work together to choose one regular citizen from people who apply and live in that region.

Commissioner Terms

Plain Language

  1. Each commissioner serves for four years. No one may serve more than eight total years on the Commission.
  2. The terms will be arranged so that no more than three commissioners finish their terms in the same year. This keeps the whole Commission from changing at once.
  3. When the Commission is first created, the first group of members will draw lots to decide who serves two, three, or four years. This sets up the staggered system. After that, all new terms will last four years.
  4. If someone leaves before their term ends, a replacement will be chosen using the same method as the original appointment and will serve only the rest of that term. If that partial term is two years or less, it will not count toward the eight-year limit.
Commissioner Qualifications and Disqualifications

Plain Language

  1. A person cannot serve as a commissioner if they:
    (1) Are currently an elected official at any level of government;
    (2) Are currently a registered lobbyist;
    (3) Worked for a political party committee in the past ten years;
    (4) Were a registered lobbyist in the past ten years;
    (5) Are the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of a member of Congress or a senior executive branch official;
    (6) Have ever been formally disciplined by a court, bar association, or judicial conduct body;
    (7) Had a complaint against them that was investigated and proven true within the past twenty years.
  2. When appointed, and once every year after that, each commissioner must file a public report that lists:
    (1) Everything they own, earn, and owe;
    (2) All political donations they made in the past ten years;
    (3) Their work history for the past ten years;
    (4) Any close family member who is currently serving in federal, state, or local government.
  3. These reports must be made available for the public to see.
Commissioner Removal and Compensation

Plain Language

  1. A commissioner can only be removed for serious wrongdoing, inability to do the job, or failure to carry out their duties.
  2. Removing a commissioner requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate.
  3. Commissioners will be paid the same salary as a federal circuit court judge.
Commission Procedures

Plain Language

  1. At least six commissioners must be present in order for the Commission to conduct official business.
  2. At least six commissioners must vote in favor of a person before that person can be nominated for a judgeship.
  3. The Commission must create clear rules for how it accepts applications, reviews candidates, and makes nominations, and those rules must be available for the public to see.
Nomination Process

Plain Language

  1. When there is an open seat on the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, or a federal court of appeals, the Commission will choose three qualified candidates for that seat.
  2. From those three, the Commission will select one person to be the official nominee.
  3. That nominee will then be sent to the Senate for confirmation.
Confirmation Process

Plain Language

  1. A nominee will automatically be confirmed thirty days after being sent to the Senate unless a Senator submits a written objection explaining specific reasons for rejection.
  2. If a written objection is filed, the Senate must hold a vote within thirty days. It takes a two-thirds vote of the Senate to reject the nominee.
  3. If the Senate does not vote within thirty days after an objection is filed, the nominee is automatically confirmed.
  4. If a nominee is rejected, the Commission will choose another nominee from the remaining candidates, and the same process will happen again.
  5. If the Senate rejects all three candidates for a vacancy, the Commission must submit three new candidates. If the Senate rejects all candidates from that second group, the Commission’s top-ranked candidate from that group is automatically confirmed.
Qualifications for Judicial Nominees

Plain Language

  1. A person cannot be appointed to the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, or a federal court of appeals if they have ever been formally disciplined by a court, bar association, or judicial conduct body, or if a complaint against them was investigated and found to be valid within the past twenty years.
  2. Every nominee must give the Commission a full disclosure report that includes:
    (1) All federal, state, and local tax returns from the past ten years;
    (2) Everything they own and owe, including debts over ten thousand dollars;
    (3) All income over one thousand dollars from the past ten years;
    (4) Any leadership or ownership roles they held in businesses during the past ten years;
    (5) All political donations they made in the past ten years;
    (6) Any close family member who is currently serving in federal, state, or local government.
  3. Once a judge is confirmed, their disclosure report must be made public.
District Court Appointments

Plain Language

  1. Federal district court judges will be chosen by the President and must be approved by a simple majority vote in the Senate.
  2. A person cannot become a district court judge if they have ever been formally disciplined by a court, bar association, or judicial conduct body, or if a complaint against them was investigated and found to be valid within the past twenty years.
  3. Every district court nominee must file the same financial and background disclosure report required in Section 9(b). If the nominee is confirmed, that report must be made public.
Geographic Restrictions

Plain Language

  1. A person cannot be appointed as a federal district court judge in a state if, during the ten years before appointment, they practiced law there, lived there, or owned real estate there.
  2. A person cannot be appointed to a federal court of appeals in a circuit that includes a state where, during the past ten years, they practiced law, lived, or owned real estate.
  3. When choosing and assigning judges, the Judicial Selection Commission must take these location rules into account and make sure all districts and circuits still have enough judges to do the work.
Enforcement

Plain Language

  1. The amendment works on its own. The moment it becomes part of the Constitution, people can use it. Congress does not have to pass another law first to “turn it on.” If someone violates it, a court can enforce it right away.
  2. Congress has the power to pass laws to carry out and enforce this amendment.
  3. Any U.S. citizen can go to federal court if they believe this amendment is being broken. They do not have to be a politician or a government official. Regular people are allowed to ask a judge to enforce it.
  4. Any State law or action that conflicts with this amendment has no legal effect.
  5. It does not take away any other rights people already have. It adds protections, but it does not reduce anything that already exists in the Constitution or other laws. If someone has another legal option to protect their rights, they can still use it.
Effective Date and Implementation

Plain Language

  1. This starts immediately once voted in; no waiting period. 
  2. Congress has to pay for this amendment by using money it already has, by moving money around in the budget, or by cutting other spending. It cannot pay for this by charging new fees or creating new taxes on regular people. But Congress is still allowed to change tax rules for people with higher incomes or big corporations if it needs to cover the cost.
  3. Within sixty days after the amendment is approved, the chief judges of the federal courts of appeals must choose the retired judge members, the American Bar Association must choose the attorney members, and the chief justices of the state supreme courts in each region must choose the regular citizen members.
  4. Within ninety days after approval, the Commission must be fully formed and must choose one of its lay members to serve as Chair.
  5. If any of these groups fail to choose their commissioners within sixty days, the chief justices of all state supreme courts, working together, will appoint temporary commissioners from the correct category until permanent members are selected.
  6. It only becomes part of the Constitution if enough states approve it. Three-fourths of the states must vote yes. If that does not happen within one year after Congress sends it to the states, then the amendment fails and does not take effect at all.
Log in to vote.

Provisional Voting

content

These options exist because some provisions in this amendment have more than one legitimate solution. The draft reflects what comparative research and international precedent suggest is the strongest approach — but reasonable people can disagree on implementation.

You get one vote per poll. You are not required to vote on any of them. Only vote if you believe the current draft language should change. If none of the listed options reflect your position, you can submit an alternative in the discussion below.

Log in to respond to provisional polls.

Questions and Consideration

Discussion parameters

This discussion space is limited to questions, suggestions, and substantive discussion directly related to the amendment proposal and its specific provisions. It is not a forum for general political advocacy, campaign messaging, misinformation, or self-promotion. All comments are moderated for relevance, accuracy, and compliance with the site’s participation standards. Comments that do not meet these requirements will be rejected. If a comment is rejected, the user will be notified and provided the reason for rejection.